Acute right atrial thrombus formation after extracorporeal life support removal during LVAD-implantation.

A 58-year-old male underwent LVAD-Implantation after ECLS explantation. After removal of ECLS (A) transesophageal echocardiography revealed thrombus in the inferior vena cava (B) and right atrium (C). The thrombus was removed with a second pump run including RVAD-Implantation. (D) The diameter of thrombus formations was 6 × 1 cm and 5 × 1.5 cm.

1-Year Patency of Biorestorative Polymeric Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts in an Ovine Model.

Many attempts have been made to inhibit or counteract saphenous vein graft (SVG) failure modes; however, only external support for SVGs has gained momentum in clinical utility. This study revealed the feasibility of implantation, and showed good patency out to 12 months of the novel biorestorative graft, in a challenging ovine coronary artery bypass graft model. This finding could trigger the first-in-man trial of using the novel material instead of SVG. We believe that, eventually, this novel biorestorative bypass graft can be one of the options for coronary artery bypass graft patients who have difficulty harvesting SVG.

The Frozen Elephant Technique Using a Novel Hybrid Prosthesis for Extensive Aortic Arch Disease: A Multicentre Study.

INTRODUCTION: The frozen elephant trunk technique (FET) has become routine for aortic arch and descending aortic repair. New hybrid prosthesis models are constantly being developed to increase effectiveness and durability of aortic repair. Recently, concerns were raised regarding increased post-operative bleeding using a new-generation hybrid prosthesis (E-vita® OPEN NEO, CryoLife Inc. JOTEC GmbH, Hechingen, Germany). We report the outcomes of a multi-centre experience of using the E-vita OPEN NEO. METHODS: All patients undergoing aortic surgery at five European centres using the E-vita OPEN NEO from 2020 to 2022 were included (n = 22). The primary endpoint was the amount of chest drain fluid after 24 h and re-thoracotomy rate for bleeding. RESULTS: Median patient age was 62.5 ± 12.6 years, 50.0% (11/22 patients) were female and 27.3% (6/22) of procedures were re-operative cardiac surgeries. Aortic dissection was present in 54.5% (12/22). The median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 148 min and ischaemia time was 84 min. Mortality at 30 days was 4.5% (1/22) and the stroke rate was 18.2% (4/22). The rate of re-thoracotomy for bleeding was 4.5% (1/22) with a median amount of chest drain fluid within 24 h of 569 (IQR 338-910) ml. There were no device-associated adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Use of this new-generation hybrid prosthesis for FET was safe and effective. Patient follow-up was largely uneventful given the extent of the procedures performed. In particular, bleeding events were uncommon in this cohort of patients comprising many aortic dissections and re-operative procedures. No increase in oozing was observed.

Impact of Initial Operative Urgency on Short-Term Outcomes in Patients Treated with ECMO Due to Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock.

The outcomes of patients with PCS and following ECMO therapy are associated with several preoperative risk factors. Our aim was to compare clinical presentation, ECMO-related data and in-hospital outcomes of patients treated with ECMO due to PCS after cardiac surgery, in regard to elective or emergent cardiac surgery procedures. Between April 2006 and October 2016, 164 consecutive patients that received VA-ECMO therapy due to PCS were identified and included in this retrospective cohort study. The patients were divided into groups based on the urgency of the initial procedures performed: elective group (ELG; n = 95) and an emergency group (EMG; n = 69). To compare the unequal patient groups, a propensity score-based matching (PSM) was applied (ELG, n = 56 vs. EMG, n = 56). The EMG primarily received ECMO intraoperatively (p ≤ 0.001). In contrast, the ELG were needed ECMO support more frequently postoperatively (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality accounted for 71% (n = 40) in the ELG and 76% (n = 43) in the EMG (p = 0.518). Outcome data showed no major differences in the (abdominal ischemia (p = 0.371); septic shock (p = 0.393): rhythm disturbances (p = 0.575); emergency re-thoracotomy (p = 0.418)) between the groups. The urgency of the initial procedures performed is secondary in patients suffering PCS and following ECMO. In this regard, PCS itself seems to trigger outcomes in cardiac surgery ECMO patients substantially.

Clinical performance of a novel bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve in a German high-volume center.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is increasingly adopted in younger patients. We aimed to analyze mid-term follow-up data after SAVR to assess the performance of the prosthesis. METHODS: Data were collected from a single-center series of 154 patients, who underwent SAVR with a bioprosthetic heart valve with the RESILIA tissue at our Heart Centre in Siegburg. All procedural and midterm patient outcomes were documented. RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 56.8 ± 9.9 years, 35.7% were female, and the mean logistic European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE) was 3.4 ± 3.6%. Diabetes (12.3%), atrial fibrillation (10.4%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (5.8%) were common comorbidities. The mean surgery duration was 163.8 ± 73.4 min, with the 23 mm (34.4%) and 25 mm (33.8%) heart valves being most frequently implanted. At 3-year follow-up, mean pressure gradient was 13.9 ± 5.9 mmHg, peak gradient was 23.6 ± 7.7 mmHg, and effective orifice area (EOA) was 1.9 ± 0.4 cm². No patient died during the operation, 3 (2.1%) patients within 30 days, and 4 (2.7%) thereafter with an overall mortality of n = 7. Of the surviving patients, 97.8% were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I/II and none had structural valve deterioration (SVD). CONCLUSION: Results of our single-center study indicate favorable procedural outcomes. The safety outcomes confirm preliminary earlier results of this novel bioprosthesis but include more patients and a longer midterm follow-up.

Comparison of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy Versus Partial Upper Sternotomy in Aortic Valve Replacement.

INTRODUCTION: Propensity score analysis of midterm outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement through right anterior mini-thoracotomy and partial upper sternotomy could provide information about the most beneficial minimally invasive technique for the patient based on the preoperative risk factors. METHODS: Between March 2015 and February 2021, 694 minimally invasive isolated aortic valve surgeries were performed at our institution. Among these, 441 right anterior mini-thoracotomies and 253 partial upper sternotomies were performed. A propensity score analysis was performed in 202 matched pairs. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamp time were significantly shorter in the right anterior mini-thoracotomy group than in the partial upper sternotomy group (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Time to first mobilization and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the right anterior mini-thoracotomy group than in the partial upper sternotomy group (p = 0.005, p = 0.001, respectively). A significantly lower incidence of revision surgery was noted in the right anterior mini-thoracotomy group than in the partial upper sternotomy group (p = 0.046). No significant differences in 30-day mortality (p = 1.000) and 1-year mortality (p = 0.543) were noted. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 96.3% in the right anterior mini-thoracotomy group and 92.7% in the partial upper sternotomy group after 4 years (log rank 0.169), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the technical challenges, right anterior mini-thoracotomy can be chosen as first-line strategy for isolated aortic valve replacement. For patients unsuitable for this technique, the partial upper sternotomy remains a safe method that can be performed by a wide range of surgeons.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with an expandable bioprosthesis after LVAD implantation as redo surgery.

Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) is currently implanted not only as a bridge to transplant or recovery but also as destination therapy. One factor, affecting the device performance and treatment adequacy negatively is the development of aortic valve insufficiency (AI) after the implantation. Herein, we introduce a minimally invasive partial sternotomy aortic valve replacement with an expandable bio-prosthesis in a 74-year-old LVAD patient with severe AI.

Does Preoperative Sinus Rhythm Influence Surgical Ablation's Perioperative Safety in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation?

BACKGROUND: Despite excellent data on lowering long-term stroke and all-cause mortality rates, currently, only 25-40% of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergo simultaneous surgical ablation therapy (SA) during cardiac surgery. Surgeon's fear exposing their patients to an additional, unjustified, and disproportionate risk when performing SA in AF patients presenting with sinus rhythm (SR) before surgery. To clarify the influence of preoperative SR before SA for AF, we conducted a subgroup analysis of the German Cardiosurgical Atrial Fibrillation (CASE-AF) register. METHODS: Between September 2016 and August 2020, 964 AF patients with an underlying cardiac disease were scheduled for surgery with SA and enrolled in the CASE-AF register. Data prospectively were collected and analyzed retrospectively. We divided the entire cohort into an SR-group (38.2%, N = 368) and an AF-group (61.8%, N = 596), based on preoperative heart rhythm. RESULTS: Over half of the patients were moderately affected by their AF, with no difference between the groups (European Heart Rhythm Association class ≥IIb: SR-group 54.2% versus AF-group 58.5%, P = .238). The AF-group had a higher preoperative EuroSCORE II (4.8 ± 8.0% versus 4.2 ± 6.3%, P = .014). In-hospital mortality (SR-group 0.8% versus AF-group 1.7%, P = .261), major perioperative adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (SR-group 2.7% versus AF-group 3.5%, P = .500), and the new pacemaker implantation rate (SR-group 6.0% versus AF-group 5.9%, P = .939) were low and showed and no group difference. Logistic regression analysis showed a protective effect for preoperative SR to perioperative complications in AF patients undergoing SA (odds ratio (OR) 0.72 (95% CI 0.52 - 0.998); P = .0485). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant SA in AF patients presenting in SR before cardiac surgery is safe, has a low perioperative risk profile, and should be carried out with almost no exceptions.

Clinical outcomes following transapical TAVR with ACURATE neo in the CHANGE neo TA study.

BACKGROUND: A transapical (TA) approach to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be used when a transfemoral (TF) approach is not feasible. The CHANGE neo TA study evaluated patients treated in routine clinical practice via TA-TAVR with the ACURATE neo bioprosthetic aortic valve. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-arm post-market study had a planned enrolment of 200 subjects; enrolment was terminated early due to declining TA-TAVR procedures at participating centers. Final enrolment was 107 patients (mean age: 79.3 years; 54.2% female; mean STS score at baseline: 6.2%). The mortality rate in the intent-to-treat population was 11.2% at 30 days (primary endpoint) and 25.6% at 12 months. The VARC-2 composite endpoint for 30-day safety occurred in 24.3% of patients. Six patients (5.6%) received a permanent pacemaker within 30 days. Site-reported echocardiographic data showed early improvements in mean aortic valve gradient (baseline: 38.8 [SD 13.1] mmHg, discharge: 6.7 [SD 3.7] mmHg) and effective orifice area (baseline: 0.7 [SD 0.2] cm2, discharge: 1.9 [SD 0.6] cm2), and the discharge rate of paravalvular regurgitation was low (74.7% none/trace, 24.2% mild, 1.1% severe). CONCLUSIONS: TA-TAVR with the ACURATE neo valve system yields acceptable clinical outcomes, providing an alternative for patients with aortic stenosis who are not candidates for TF-TAVR.

Prognostic impact of echocardiographic mean transvalvular gradients in patients with aortic stenosis and low flow undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Blunted left ventricular hemodynamics reflected by a low stroke volume index (SVI) ≤35 mL/m2 body surface area (low flow [LF]) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) are associated with worse outcomes even after correction of afterload by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). These patients can have a low or high transvalvular mean pressure gradient (MPG). We investigated the impact of the pre-interventional MPG on outcomes after TAVI. METHODS: Patients with LF AS were classified into those with normal (EF ≥ 50%; LF/NEF) or reduced ejection fraction (EF < 50%; LF/REF) and were then stratified according to an MPG < or ≥ 40 mmHg. Patients with SVI >35 mL/m2 (normal flow; NF) served as controls. RESULTS: 597 patients with LF/NEF, 264 patients with LF/REF and 975 patients with NF were identified. Among all groups those patients with a low MPG were characterized by higher cardiovascular risk. In patients with LF/REF, functional improvement post-TAVI was less pronounced in low-MPG patients. One-year survival was significantly worse in LF AS patients with a low vs. high MPG (LF/NEF 16.5% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.022; LF/REF 25.4% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.002), whereas no differences were found in NF patients (8.7% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.550). In both LF AS groups, a low pre-procedural MPG emerged as an independent predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LF AS, an MPG cut-off of 40 mmHg defines two patient populations with fundamental differences in outcomes after TAVI. Patients with LF AS and a high MPG have the same favorable prognosis as patients with NF AS.

Case Report: Living on the Edge-Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Related Infective Endocarditis.

Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) following mitral valve edge-to-edge repair is a rare complication with high mortality. Case summary: A 91-year-old male patient was admitted to intensive care unit with sepsis due to urinary tract infection after insertion of a urinary catheter by the outpatient urologist. Two weeks ago, the patient was discharged from hospital after successful transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) using a PASCAL Ace device. The initially withdrawn blood revealed repeatedly Proteus mirabilis bacteremia as causal for the sepsis due to urinary tract infection. An antibiotic regime with Ampicillin/Sulbactam was initiated and discontinued after 7 days. During the clinical course the patient again developed fever and blood cultures again revealed P. mirabilis. In transesophageal echocardiography (TOE), IE of the PASCAL Ace device was confirmed by a vegetation accompanied by a mild to moderate mitral regurgitation. While the patient was stable at this time and deemed not suitable for cardiac surgery, the endocarditis team made a decision toward a prolonged 6-week antibiotic regime with an antibiotic combination of Ampicillin 2 g qds and Ciprofloxacin 750 mg td. Due to posterior leaflet perforation severe mitral regurgitation developed while PASCAL Ace vegetations were significantly reduced by the antibiotic therapy. Therefore, the patient underwent successful endoscopic mitral valve replacement. Another 4 weeks of antibiotic treatment with Ampicillin 2 g qds followed before the patient was discharged. Discussion: P. mirabilis is able to form biofilms, resulting in a high risk for endocarditis following transcatheter mitral valve repair especially when device endothelization is incomplete. Endoscopic mitral valve replacement could serve as a bailout strategy in refractory Clip-endocarditis.

Does the severity of low-gradient aortic stenosis classified by computed tomography-derived aortic valve calcification determine the outcome of patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)?

OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve calcification (AVC) determined by computed tomography has emerged as a complementary measure of aortic stenosis (AS) severity and as a predictor of adverse events. Thus, AVC can guide further treatment decisions in patients with low-gradient AS (LG-AS). We compared the symptomatic and prognostic outcome of patients with low vs. high AVC after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: Patients with an aortic valve area index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2 and a mean pressure gradient (MPG) < 40 mmHg were classified as low-flow, low-gradient AS (LFLG-AS; stroke volume index [SVI] ≤ 35 ml/m2, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] < 50%, n = 173), paradoxical LFLG-AS (pLFLG-AS, SVI ≤ 35 ml/m2, LVEF ≥ 50%, n = 233), or normal-flow, low-gradient AS (NFLG-AS, SVI > 35 ml/m2, LVEF ≥ 50%, n = 244); patients with MPG ≥ 40 mmHg (n = 1142) served as controls. Patients were further categorized according to published AVC thresholds. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics and cardiovascular risk were not different between patients with high vs. low AVC in any of the subgroups. Patients with low AVC had a lower MPG. Symptom improvement at 30 days was observed in the majority of patients but was less pronounced in LFLG-AS patients with low vs. those with high AVC. Kaplan-Meier 1-year survival curves were identical between patients with low and high AVC in all three LG-AS groups. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of LG-AS based on AVC has no impact on 1-year prognosis once TAVI has been performed. KEY POINTS: • Aortic valve calcification (AVC) determined by computed tomography has emerged as a complementary measure of aortic stenosis (AS) severity and is of prognostic value in selected patients. • Patients with inconsistent echocardiographic measures can be classified as having severe or nonsevere AS by the computed tomography-derived AVC score. • The prognostic value of AVC in patients with low-gradient AS is abrogated after correction of afterload by TAVI.

Challenges of recognizing bicuspid aortic valve in elderly patients undergoing TAVR.

Recognition of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) may be challenging in elderly patients with heavily calcified aortic valves undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In this subset, the diagnostic value of pre-procedural echocardiography in clinical routine is unknown. From a total of 2583 patients undergoing TAVR in our center, we determined the rate of BAV detected by routine echocardiography as documented in the medical records. Pre-procedural multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) images were retrospectively analyzed for the presence of BAV and served as reference standard. Using MDCT criteria, BAV was found in 235 (9.1%) (age 80.1 years [interquartile range 76.4; 83.4], 44.3% female). Of these, only 27/235 (11.5%) had been identified as BAV according to echocardiography reports, whereas 6/2348 (0.3%) with TAV had been wrongly diagnosed as BAV (p < 0.001; sensitivity 11.5%, specificity 99.7%). Correct diagnosis of BAV by echocardiography was more likely when transesophageal echocardiography was available (odds ratio (OR) 5.12 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.22; 11.80]; p < 0.001) and the reader was experienced (OR 5.28 [95% CI 1.55; 18.04]; p = 0.008). Furthermore, correct diagnosis of BAV was more likely in bicommissural-type BAV (OR 2.22 [95% CI 0.90; 5.48]; p = 0.08), whereas heavy aortic valve calcification lead to misdiagnosis (OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.14; 1.06]; p = 0.07). In elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis that are candidates for TAVR, the presence of BAV may be considerably underestimated when relying solely on routine echocardiography. This underlines the value of MDCT for the screening of BAV in this patient population.

Outcome of patients with heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

AIMS: Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) may have concomitant heart failure (HF) that determines prognosis despite successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We compared outcomes of TAVI patients with low stroke volume index (SVI) ≤35 ml/m2 body surface area in different HF classes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients treated by transfemoral TAVI at our center (n = 1822) were classified as 1) 'HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF)' (HFpEF, EF ≥50%), 2) 'HF with mid-range EF' (HFmrEF, EF 40-49%), or 3) 'HF with reduced EF' (HFrEF, EF <40%). Patients with SVI >35 ml/m2 served as controls. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease and symptoms increased stepwise from controls (n = 968) to patients with HFpEF (n = 591), HFmrEF (n = 97), and HFrEF (n = 166). Mortality tended to be highest in HFrEF patients 30 days post-procedure, and it became significant after one year: 10.2% (controls), 13.5% (HFpEF), 13.4% (HFmrEF), and 23.5% (HFrEF). However, symptomatic improvement in survivors of all groups was achieved in the majority of patients without differences among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AS and HF benefit from TAVI with respect to symptom alleviation. TAVI in patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF led to an identical, favorable post-procedural prognosis that was significantly better than that of patients with HFrEF, which remains a high-risk population.

Long-term outcome after mitral valve replacement using biological versus mechanical valves.

BACKGROUND: This study compared long-term outcomes of biological and mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients requiring replacement of the mitral valve where repair was not feasible. METHODS: A single-centre registry of patients receiving MVR between 2005 and 2015 was established. Thirty-day mortality and long-term outcomes were analysed and compared. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty four patients underwent MVR (265 biological; 59 mechanical valves). Patients receiving biological valves were older (p < 0.001), had a higher log EuroSCORE (p < 0.001) and received less minimally invasive surgery (p < 0.001). Immediate procedural mortality was 1.9%, which only occurred in the biological valve group. At 30 days, 9.0% of patients had died, 4.0% experienced stroke, 8.0% received a pacemaker and 10.5% suffered an acute renal failure. The rate of re-thoracotomy (14.2%) was lower in the biological (12.5%) than in the mechanical valve group (22.0%; adjOR 0.45 [0.20-1.00]; p = 0.050). Frequent long-term complications were stroke (9.2%) and bleeding (4.8%), with bleeding complications being higher in the mechanical valve group (p = 0.009). During the follow-up period biological valves showed a numerically higher survival rate during the first years, which shifted after 3 years in favour of mechanical valves. At 10 years, survival rates were 62.4% vs. 77.1% in the biological and mechanical valve groups (p = 0.769). Hazard ratio after adjustment was 0.833 (95% CI 0.430-1.615). CONCLUSION: These data confirm that mechanical valve implantation is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. While there was a potential survival benefit during the first years after surgery for patients receiving a biological valves the difference became insignificant after a follow-up of 10 years.

Annular versus supra-annular sizing for TAVI in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.

AIMS: We sought to compare annular versus supra-annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective single-centre analysis, we measured the aortic annulus (Ann) and intercommissural distance (ICD) on multidetector computed tomography scans in 217 BAV patients. With annular sizing being the default method for prosthesis size selection in all cases, we determined clinically relevant sizing errors and assessed the hypothetical impact of supra-annular sizing. Overall there was no significant difference between ICD and Ann (25.1 [23.5; 27.3] vs. 25.4 [23.6; 27.1] mm; p=0.24); intra-individually, ICD was similar to Ann in 26.7%, smaller in 40.1%, and larger in 33.2%. Annular sizing was appropriate in 96.3%, oversized in 0.5%, and undersized in 3.2% of cases. Supra-annular sizing would have resulted in a divergent size selection in 38.7% (smaller: 17.5%, larger: 19.8%, ICD out of range for TAVI prostheses: 1.4%) with potential improvement in a few cases with annular sizing errors, but potential worsening due to improper size selection in a much larger proportion of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Annular sizing for TAVI in BAV is feasible and safe. The added value of supra-annular sizing is questionable.

1-Year Survival After TAVR of Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient and High-Gradient Aortic Valve Stenosis in Matched Study Populations.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine whether the prognosis of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) having high versus low transvalvular mean pressure gradients (MPGs) is intrinsically different after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), even after strict matching of baseline parameters. BACKGROUND: Patients with low MPG are characterized by higher cardiovascular risk and more comorbidities than other AS patients are. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study involving 2,282 patients, 3 groups were derived according to the following criteria: 1) high-gradient AS (HG-AS) (MPG ≥40 mm Hg); 2) low-flow, low-gradient AS (LFLG-AS) (MPG <40 mm Hg, ejection fraction [EF] ≤40%, stroke volume index ≤35 ml/m2); 3) paradoxical LFLG-AS (pLFLG-AS) (similar to LFLG-AS but with EF ≥50%). Propensity score matching that included EF was used to compare 1-year survival. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients with HG-AS or LFLG-AS were identified. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were significantly different (p = 0.039), with death occurring in 11 versus 21 patients (hazard ratio: 2.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.02 to 4.39; p = 0.044), respectively. A total of 226 patients with HG-AS or pLFLG-AS were identified and here the curves were identical (p = 0.468), with death occurring in 18 versus 21 patients (hazard ratio: 1.26; 95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 2.38; p = 0.469). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study comparing survival after TAVR of patients with high versus low MPG in matched study populations. Mortality in patients with LFLG-AS was twice that of HG-AS patients. However, it appears that patients with pLFLG-AS might benefit from TAVR to the same extent as patients with HG-AS. There must be still unmasked factors that influence mortality of patients with LFLG-AS.

Transfemoral implantation of the ACURATE neo prosthesis using a low-profile expandable introducer system: A multicenter registry.

BACKGROUND: The ACURATE neo prosthesis is commonly implanted using introducer sheaths with inner diameters of up to 20 French. The use of only the expandable mesh component of the transGlide introducer system (Meshonly) would substantially decrease the inner diameter to 13 French. We sought to assess the feasibility and safety of using Meshonly for femoral access of the ACURATE neo device and to compare outcomes with patients in whom standard sheaths were used. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 551 patients with severe aortic stenosis from 4 high volume centers in Germany and Switzerland undergoing transfemoral TAVI between February 2016 and February 2018 with implantation of the ACURATE neo device. The median age was 81.7 [78.3-85.2], 67.0% were female, the STS score was 4.2% [2.8-6.5]. The use of the Meshonly was feasible in all attempted cases (n = 272); in all other patients, a standard sheath was used. Major vascular complications at the main access-site (VARC-2) were less frequent in the Meshonly group than in the standard sheath group (1.5% vs. 7.9%; p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, the use of Meshonly was independently associated with less major vascular complications (odds ratio 0.10 [95% CI 0.02-0.48]; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Transfemoral implantation of the ACURATE neo device using the Meshonly was associated with a lower rate of major access-related complications when compared to the standard of care.

Accuracy of device landing zone calcium volume measurement with contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: The extent of aortic valve calcification is an important determinant of procedural success in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We sought to validate device landing zone calcium volume (DLZ-CV) measurements on contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with non-contrast-enhanced scans as reference. METHODS: We determined DLZ-CV in 141 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI. Non-contrast-enhanced images were analyzed using a threshold of 130 HU as reference (DLZ-CV130). For contrast-enhanced scans, we applied various thresholds including 450 HU (DLZ-CV450), 850 HU (DLZ-CV850), mean aortic attenuation (AttenAo) + 2 SD (DLZ-CV2SD), AttenAo + 4 SD (DLZ-CV4SD), AttenAo + 4 SD + 5 mm3 volume filter (DLZ-CV4SD+), and based on visual estimation (DLZ-CVvis). We compared DLZ-CV values between patients with versus without paravalvular leak (PVL), and between patients with versus without post-dilatation stratified by the type of prosthesis. RESULTS: All DLZ-CV measurements on contrast-enhanced scans significantly differed from DLZ-CV130 (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The best approximation to DLZ-CV130 was achieved with DLZ-CV4SD+ (508 mm3 [332-772]; Pearson correlation: R = 0.87, p < 0.001; Bland-Altman: mean difference 1339 mm3 [limits of agreement 79;2600]). Moreover, DLZ-CV4SD+ allowed for discrimination of PVL ≥1° or the need for post-dilatation in patients receiving self-expanding prostheses. Procedural outcome using balloon-expandable prostheses was independent of DLZ-CV. CONCLUSION: Measurement of DLZ-CV using contrast-enhanced scans with unadjusted thresholds results in incorrect estimation of the calcium volume. The use of a scan-specific individual HU threshold including a volume filter (DLZ-CV4SD+) provides the best approximation to the reference and allows for discrimination of PVL ≥ 1° in patients receiving the Acurate neo prosthesis.